Re: Looking for UML tool with qualified association and association class
(for now), and I've used it under Linux for documentation purposes. I
have no affiliation with the tool.
It will handle association classes. It doesn't do qualified
associations, but it has other ways to handle the constraints, that
Objects with Attitudes
Re: [UML Forum] Looking for UML tool with qualified association and association class
mainly provides:
* Model graphical editors like UML2, Data Base (DB), BPMN, User
Interface, WBS and
* Model Transformations like UML2DB, DB2UML, BPMN2UML, DB2DDL (Oracle,
Postgresql, MySQL)
* Code generation: OpenXava, JPA, PHP.
* Other features: Reverse engineering (Oracle, Postgresql, MySQL),
Re: Looking for UML tool with qualified association and association class
not free, but great functionality for money IMHO
Phil
Re: [UML Forum] Looking for UML tool with qualified association and association class
-Jim
Sent from my iPhone
Re: AW: AW: [UML Forum] UML is semi-formal language Why?
fUML is essentially the Action Semantics originally brought in with
v1.5. That semantics filled a huge hole in UML by providing a low-level,
standard execution semantic definition. But it is low-level and no one
but a tool vendor or translation methodologist ever has any exposure to
Looking for UML tool with qualified association and association class
I am looking for a UML tool, running on Linux, that is able to :
- handle association classes,
- handle qualified associations,
- run under Linux,
- for documentation purpose (no interaction with Java or C/C++ code
for now).
I already tried ArgoUML, Papyrus and bouml, but non of them seems to
AW: AW: [UML Forum] UML is semi-formal language Why?
As I said with fUML and its operational semantics…
Regards,
Marc-Florian
Von: umlforum@googlegroups.com [mailto:umlforum@googlegroups. com] Im Auftrag
von Michael Jesse Chonoles
Gesendet: Montag, 23. Januar 2012 23:22
An: umlforum@googlegroups.com
Betreff: Re: AW: [UML Forum] UML is semi-formal language Why?
Re: AW: [UML Forum] UML is semi-formal language Why?
______________________________ __
From: Timothy Marc <timothym...@freenet.de>
To: umlforum@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 3:15 PM
Hi,
Short answer: Because it has a well-defined syntax (so it is
Re: AW: [UML Forum] UML is semi-formal language Why?
While I agree for UML as a whole, I would point out that with an MDA
profile on can select a consistent subset of model elements and apply a
rigorous semantics to them. Otherwise it would not be possible to do
full code generation for UML OOA models, and that technology has been
Re: [UML Forum] UML is semi-formal language Why?
modeling one. That's OK if models and programs are merged (in other words
if models are just a distraction), otherwise it's confusing (at best).
[link]
[link]
AW: [UML Forum] UML is semi-formal language Why?
Short answer: Because it has a well-defined syntax (so it is
computer-readable), but not an inherent, unambiguous and precise (in terms
of mathematical precision) semantics. The semantics of a UML element is
provided in prose, which is inherently ambiguous.
As a result, a UML model can be read by a computer, but due to the lack of
UML is semi-formal language Why?
I have just one question about UML.
Why we say that UML is semi-formal language ?
Thank you.
Re: [UML Forum] About simplifying the uML
I have to disagree with strongly with the first sentence. UML was
developed by the Three Amigos -- Booch, Jacobson, and Rumbaugh -- at
Rational Software. It was a synthesis of their three methodologies for
OOA/D (the Booch Method, OOSE, and OMT, respectively). IOW, it was
designed to be a general notation for expressing OOA/D. From reading
Re: About simplifying the uML
if its use is to be not only more widely spread, but also more effective.
Domain specific languages and profiles will split up the UML, and it's
difficult to see how to simplify it without hampering its qualities.
Actually, the objective should be to get a better match between UML